Comparison of hair collection methods

この記事の概要

Below are detailed explanations of the advantages and disadvantages of both machine and manual hair extraction.

When using a machine to collect hair

merit

  1. Faster : The use of an electric machine allows more hair follicles to be removed in a shorter period of time, reducing the overall time of the procedure compared to manual techniques and making it easier for the patient.
  2. High engraftment rate : By using the machine, hair follicles are easily removed evenly and there is minimal damage to the hair roots, which is said to result in a high engraftment rate after transplantation .
  3. Easy to operate even with low levels of skill : Electric machines are relatively easy to operate, and even technicians without advanced techniques can easily obtain stable results.

Disadvantages

  1. Difficult to control : With machines, it can be difficult to control each individual hair follicle, which can be a disadvantage when looking for a natural-looking result.
  2. Moderate cost : Often cheaper than manual labor, but can be moderately expensive depending on the type of machinery and techniques used.

Manually

merit

  1. Precise work is possible using the right technique : When performed by an experienced technician, fine adjustments can be made and natural hair flow can be reproduced, resulting in a very natural finish.
  2. Highly customizable : Treatment can be tailored to each individual hair follicle, allowing for personalized care, such as transplanting the most suitable hair follicles in a specific area.

Disadvantages

  1. Slow work : Manual work takes time, so depending on the surgeon’s skill, the procedure time can be longer. This can also be a burden on the patient.
  2. Dependent on the skill of the surgeon : Manual procedures require advanced techniques and experience, and the skill of the surgeon greatly affects the results. If performed by an inexperienced surgeon, the engraftment rate and finish may not be stable.
  3. High cost : Manual methods require time and skill, so they tend to be more expensive than machine-based methods.

summary

  • Machine hair harvesting is superior in terms of speed, stability, and cost, making it suitable for those who need to harvest a lot of hair in a short amount of time or who want a reliable engraftment rate. On the other hand, it may be inferior to manual methods when detailed customization or a natural finish is required.
  • Manual hair harvesting can produce precise, natural results when done by a skilled technician, but it tends to be time-consuming and expensive as it depends heavily on the technician’s skill.

Each method has its own advantages and disadvantages depending on the patient’s needs and the surgeon’s skills, so it is important to choose the most appropriate method.

記事の監修者


岡 博史 先生

CAPラボディレクター

慶應義塾大学 医学部 卒業

医学博士

皮膚科専門医